The honradez is the best policy: and there is nothing more honored in a government that assume the responsibility of its decisions. Well, Spain's government has taken, against this difficult period, measured from the ethics of responsibility. The same responsibility and the same conviction that led to this government to raise and address major reforms that our country had and have to rush. Today we can assert that protects us credibility, because the record of this government is long. By targeting only highlight some relevant points:
- the adoption in 2005 of several laws to boost productivity .
- The Land Act 2007, which laid the basis to curb the housing bubble fueled by the growing popular political easy, when they said that Spain was well.
- The restructuring the financial system, the only structural reforms agreed with the PP, by the way, despite the claim that every day
- The services sector liberalization, with the transposition of EU Directive (with position by the party calling themselves liberal who seemed ready to adopt five-year plans)
- A law ports,
- A Labour reform approved last week,
- or the pursuit of a Pact on Education , aware of what this would mean for the future of our country, This would mean having a stable and agreed to train tomorrow's citizens. Thus, the government recently approved a Plan of Action with clear objectives and adequate funding. Also in this ladies and gentlemen have been left out of the popular group.
strictly in the general government sector we can add value to the work well done, with the approval of:
- a Agencies Act, which implies greater organizational flexibility and a step change in the conception of Public Administration, thinking more on a search results
- a new law public sector contracts
- Civil Service Basic Statute , claimed all these years of democracy
- and an electronic access Act, seeking Adm. modernization but also its efficiency and effectiveness in public service work and reduce burdens for citizens and businesses
And we'll keep passing and bringing the camera further structural reforms to be carried out, we expect the consensus of the main opposition party, as
. reform legislation savings banks (LORCA) to improve the professionalism of its governing bodies and increase their own resources.
. pension system reform to tackle the demographic challenge and ensure its sustainability in the future.
. Or Civil Law of the State Administration .
Therefore, we have worked from day one in the right direction and we will do, aware that the implementation of these reforms will be decisive in the coming decades.
TOUGH MEASURES IN ALL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
In this context, a context of background work carried out for 6 years in office, "of which the latter have been overwhelmed by economic crisis very strong, and in a European context is committed to strengthening economic coordination to more effectively combat this crisis and promote recovery, we come to measures to reduce the deficit affecting public officials and emergency measures.
All these measures taken, all of them, are measures not imposed, but shared with other Member States of the European Union. All countries have implemented an austerity plan between May and June this year.
do not know what reasoning mechanism works in those who argue that the measures taken by Cameron (such as tax increases, by the way) is a decision British government, or that decisions made by German Chancellor Angela Merkel announced on June 7 to cut 10,000 public employees and those who are lowering their wages by 2.5% on average is an adjustment plan very German and very appropriate time, or that Italy freeze the salaries of staff for 3 years is a brave and wise decision of Berlusconi.
said I do not know what reasoning is to say this while reiterating that the decisions taken by the government of Spain, President Rodriguez Zapatero are the result of a European tax while impromptu late. Only from the complex can think and defend it. Only from the desire to discredit our country can defend.
Had we started the fiscal adjustment 2 years ago, in a recession, says it has made the People's Party, would have been the only country in the G-20 not to fiscal stimulus measures to cushion the downturn. If they had done what would have happened if it is easy to predict: free fall growth and more unemployment. So far we have been among the first countries to initiate and accelerate the process of fiscal consolidation.
The truth is there is no time to talk about foreign policy or Spain's relations with third countries the right not bring up the word ridiculous. The PP is ashamed, but shame it only has to do with their insecurity. The uncertainty of when you're young and everything your parents do and the people around you seem ridiculous. Not because this feeling has to do with the objective conditions of the attitude of your parents, like foreign policy has nothing to do with the attitude of the government objective, but by simple insecurity, the insecurity that gives the immaturity of adolescence . The PP is right teenager in Europe, also why it so difficult to take responsibility.
Ultimately, all European countries, all have taken steps that go in the same direction and have also taken at the same time as ours. All these reforms are a key part of increasing confidence and credibility of our economy.
Maybe we're all bumping or changes of direction? No, I think it is something else.
ideological coherence: POLICY COHERENCE AND SECURITIES.
ACTION BY DUTY, NOT BY DEVOTION
These are exceptional measures for exceptional circumstances, so it is not changing approach or move one's position is that imperative must be done because the facts warrant, because that is what is expected of politicians, rulers, capable of decisively deal with situations like it or not, whether foreseeable or unforeseeable, and in the latter case we are able to react. We must be able to identify and defend the public interest and our responsibility (of all) is to be able to explain to citizens.
We've spent far as we could to revive the economy. We primacy maintenance of all policies that were in operation until the debt has reached a number that no longer could increase further. If our goal, as is the maintenance of social cohesion and the promotion of welfare policies is necessary to know that no more debt, so that in future investment in these social policies are not being eroded by the payment of debt.
In any case, the lines of the socialist government policies have not changed: the pursuit of social justice and the public sector have a strong general government, to serve the public, that can ensure equal opportunities are what we seek. We
cuts we make out of obligation, others would devotion.
We do this to save the welfare state, others would do to weaken it, because they are devotees of the state minimum and maximum market. So, Mr. Rajoy spoke last week of the oversized public sector.
This will
face hard decisions now so that tomorrow we can maintain social policies, the government has presented the Decree Law 8 / 2010 of 20 May by adopting special measures to reduce the deficit.
DECREE LAW AS A PROCESS COMPLETION
This decree law also does not come in isolation, but is framed in a context of general government austerity, rationalization of administrative structures and severe spending restraint :
In 2009 the budget was applied to non-availability agreement affecting all ministries of 2,500 million euros.
This year we have approved the Plan for Immediate Action 2010 that meant a cut in expenditure of 5,000 million euros in addition to the already collected in the State Budget and
The Austerity Plan of 2011-2013 AGE, which poses a board cut in spending with an impact equivalent to 2.6% of GDP until 2013.
We therefore applied:
1. the reduction of public employment offer to 10%
2. the reduction officials in 33 and the freezing of their salaries for 2 years consecutive
3. reduction of 29 public companies
4. Streamlining foundations and state-owned enterprises and
5. in particular, the rationalization of the structures of government delegations.
Thus, in addition to those measures already underway, the Government introduced the Decree Law 8 / 2010 with the need for a cut in salaries of public employees, a decrease equitable distribution efforts with a principle of progressive , so that, with the average cut of 5%, the Central Government pay reduction ranges from 7% for members of the group A1 and 0.56% for members of group E (or 2.75% for C2 group). And remember that in a year of exemplary, cutting the salaries of members of the Government, which is lower than that in many cases receive top officials, was 15%.
VALUE OF GOVERNMENT SERVANTS AS
All these measures have nothing to do with not believing in government officials. On the contrary. We believe and know they do a great job, a job too often unsung everyday, and do it for commitment to the public, service-minded. Hence our commitment to introduce all the reforms we have introduced in recent years from the government to improve in depth the AAPP. No need to say that we the side of workers and staff, our policies, when you hold the government and to his credit.
also know that there are also the weakest part: the weakest are those that have been (or already) in the strike with family responsibilities, working in precarious conditions, with timetables and appalling conditions which do not know if next month will be able to continue in this precarious work, the weakest are those who live in a bloody manner the uncertainty, insecurity, the day after ... because that uncertainty is what makes us more vulnerable.
we know all this, we think the tenure, the job security and commitment to the public that makes the vast majority of staff understand this request for an extraordinary effort, because their efforts will impact on a collective benefit that is not to ask a greater sacrifice to other citizens.
On the other hand, I honestly do not think the main opposition party in a position to criticize the measure. During the period of 8 years 1996-2004 ruled, there was a cumulative nominal increase of 15.3%, while the cumulative CPI over the same period showed an increase of 22.8%, public employees lost 7.5 percentage of purchasing power during the administrations of PP, while between 2005 and 2009 there was a cumulative nominal increase of 16%, with a CPI of 12.8%, so that public employees' purchasing power gained 3.2 percentage points.
seems that if bonanza froze wages and were not able to at least maintain the purchasing power of those offering a public service to all citizens, and held a restocking fee of 25% in most years, in a situation like ours not know what decisions had been taken in this area.
In any case, we do know is that the credibility of the PP to defend the public sector is certainly reduced, most with their leader saying that the Civil Service is too broad.
But this is just the tip of the iceberg of the design that has the PP people. The bulk of the problem is that the only possible conclusion after hearing their statements and actions is that they do not believe in people or in the country: perhaps they thought that government employees would not understand the request for this effort? The English right has little regard for the civic engagement of staff, their understanding of the problems of our society, its maturity, its reasonableness. Also, never appeal to the maturity and commitment of staff, but his selfishness more blunt, selfish politicking.
appeal to selfishness, think that there is only private vices ... is a sample of what people think. Citizens are more virtuous than the PP believe. Citizens are able to understand that personal effort can yield a collective benefit. That is our conviction and govern from there ... the issue is to ask from where they intended to govern?
We run from the trust in people, govern and ask them to get the best of themselves. You can not expect to govern by appealing to the worst in people, encouraging and expecting them just selfishness, just because people English is not.
0 comments:
Post a Comment