have a good substantive discussion, almost political history and democratic are not given opportunities both in Parliament. This, for example, is a good debate to discuss Freedom Freedom positive and negative of citizens, understood the latter as the provision of personal spaces where the state can not limit access and therefore the also public authorities are subject. No need to stand out in this camera the importance of it, associating the recognition of a list of fundamental rights and guarantees maximum protection.
One of those rights in our Constitution is right to privacy as recognized in Article 18 and in some ways an exception that our legal system provides for this right is precisely the existence of the Municipal Register ing the data of all inhabitants of a town . Is an element that has proved absolutely necessary: \u200b\u200b
- Accreditation of habitual residence.
- Know the number of inhabitants of a town.
- Knowing participation in a council tax since it is based on the number of inhabitants.
- Calculate the number of councilors in local elections or
- Set the minimum services to be provided by the Municipalities and, therefore, to properly size the public service should offer.
therefore provides for the mandatory registration in the Register, it is key to public services offered to citizens. Now, with the consciousness of exceptionalism and having well defined its duties is also conceived with many limitations:
• Only you can access it the Municipal Administration and other government when they are necessary for the exercise of their powers and only for cases in which the residence or domicile are relevant or statistical purposes (such as the electoral roll). That is, the standard is not intended in any case, for special access.
• In second place, the general rule reflects the need for prior consent and only exceptionally may disclose records without consent.
allow me forethought before entering the contents of the bill. In 1890 was probably the first time you wrote about this "new" right to privacy "The Right To Be Let Alone." Warren and Brandeis introduced the need for privacy and thereafter the struggle she has been instrumental in the development of democratic societies. On the other hand, much earlier are the first census to know and to be given, for example in the Egypt of the Pharaohs or the China of the Han Dynasty which was already 4,000 years ago, the number of inhabitants.
More recently, in 1967 became the Council of Europe an Advisory Committee which drew up the resolution 509 "On Human Rights and new scientific and technical achievements." I think it is no exaggeration to say that the resolution was the trigger for the legislation that has since been developed Europe's data protection.
In this sense, we could stop in the jurisprudence of the ECHR in which considered inseparable right to privacy with the right to data protection. I also emphasize the Article 8 ECHR because his own writing shows us as the main objective is to guarantee this right against the government (as holders of inside information) on the assumption that, inaccessible to other individual privacy is guaranteed.
grounds with wanted nothing to show for the camera and the public that we are not talking about a minor reform, not a side issue of our legal system, but the backbone of the configuration of a democratic state right, the catalog fundamental rights that all societies have been open and still recognized, where what is at stake is the dignity of individuals.
Perhaps it is good that we have 24 hours of Big Brother on TV (that, in any case, would be another debate), but it would be intolerable for all the Big Brother Orwell's government-in what would qualify as abuse of power - exploited information from us for use outside the legally assessed. But much worse it would make available to a particular data. Open that door is not a decision that we take lightly.
The bill now is to try to recognize property owners access to information of the Municipal and with the objective of getting to know the people registered in it and thus control the performance of leases that have been concluded.
The Catalan group's intention seems to be aimed at increasing safety and security of homeowners who have decided to rent a home.
believe that the goal is laudable but disproportionate because it would violate the tenant's protected data.
We therefore face a bill than willing to fix a problem, we do not deny, we propose to change the rules of the game regarding the protection of a fundamental right: the group Socialist parliamentary route considered err in finding a solution.
addition, as I said, it seems disproportionate to enforce a contract between private or encroach violates a fundamental right. It would be like saying that those with property have the right to privacy, as anyone who has a rental apartment right to privacy is less. Graduation does not appear that this type when it is a fundamental right is justified.
But also, the vote of the Socialist Group will be negative to the consideration of this bill not only for these basic questions: technical and legal profound conception of the democratic state and rule of law, but also because we are convinced that not the solution to the problem to be addressed.
ladies and gentlemen, the municipal use for other purposes beyond those identified so far may have unpredictable consequences. I will not dwell on future or disquisitions on things we do not know, but let me point out just a reflection that you all understand.
Anyone who knows that the standard can be used by an individual, even if just to report a lease that has the immediate effect is that censuses will fall, not the underlying problem to be solved.
Therefore we think that the analysis of existing problems, we can not address through this bill,
. because it is a valid instrument to address this problem
. because the right to property, which wholeheartedly endorse, can not override a fundamental right, which is what we CiU
proposed in this initiative. and because it involves questioning a system of guarantees established and necessary to protect the fundamental rights of all citizens, all citizens equally.
0 comments:
Post a Comment